Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Minutemen, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1991No. 90-1241PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Three questions are presented: (1) Is declaratory judgment an adequate remedy at law? (2) Do the classifications violate Section 35, Article II, Ohio Constitution and former R.C. 4123.29 by failing to reflect the degree of occupational or industrial hazard? and (3) Do the classifications violate equal protection? For the reasons to follow, we reverse the appellate court’s judgment.

The court below mistakenly relied on State, ex rel. Viox Builders, Inc., v. Lancaster (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 144, 545 N.E.2d 895, in finding a declaratory judgment action to be an adequate remedy at law. While the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. State ex rel. Viox Builders, Inc. v. LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Progressive Sweeping Contractors, Inc. v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Craftsmen Basement Finishing System, Inc. v. RyanOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State ex rel. Cafaro Management Co. v. KielmeyerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State ex rel. Able Temps, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API