Legal Opinion

Stancle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 7, 2005No. 4D05-2411PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

917 So.2d 911 (2005)

Rufus STANCLE, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 4D05-2411.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

December 7, 2005.

Rehearing Denied January 31, 2006.

Rufus Stancle, Miami, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

HAZOURI, J.

Rufus Stancle appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 based on several claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We affirm the denial as to all claims of ineffective assistance of counsel except Stancle's claim alleging that trial counsel's…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  4. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  5. Valle v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Anthony v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Rouzard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Louis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Monfiston v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  5. Bronder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API