Legal Opinion
Monfiston v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 27, 2006No. 4D06-380PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
946 So.2d 1194 (2006)
Franklin MONFISTON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 4D06-380.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
December 27, 2006.
Franklin Monfiston, Belle Glade, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Claudine M. LaFrance, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
Monfiston seeks post-conviction relief under rule 3.850 based on his counsel's failure to assert a claim that Miranda[1] warnings were insufficient for the reason we addressed in Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Roberts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Stancle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
4Cited by3 opinions
- Franklin Monfiston v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- MONFISTON v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- McGill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007