Legal Opinion
De Zimm v. Connelie
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner, then involved in litigation against the State, requested disclosure pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (Public Officers Law, art 6) of any State Police regulations concerning an officer’s duty to record conversations while wearing a monitoring device. The request was denied on the grounds that the materials were compiled for law enforcement purposes and would if disclosed reveal criminal investigative techniques and procedures, and that they were intra-agency materials…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brady v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Chemical Bank v. Von BulowNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- MATTER OF ATTORNEY-GEN. OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. KatzNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- De Zimm v. ConnelieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dobranski v. HouperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Allen v. J. J. StrojnowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Flores v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Matter of Lane v. Port Wash. Police Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Brownstone Publishers, Inc. v. New York City Department of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.