Legal Opinion
De Zimm v. Connelie
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 26, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kane, J.
In a letter dated December 1,1981, petitioner requested respondent to disclose any specific rules and regulations which the State Police had concerning the procedures followed when employing electronic surveillance and monitoring devices during criminal investigations. Since petitioner was involved in a pending lawsuit against the State of New York, his letter was forwarded to the New York State Attorney-General’s office for comment. Petitioner was informed of the referral in a letter dated December 11, 1981.
*669Petitioner responded with another letter to respondent,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fink v. LefkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Westchester Rockland Newspapers, Inc. v. KimballNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Kheel v. RavitchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Kheel v. RavitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dobranski v. HouperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Allen v. J. J. StrojnowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- De Zimm v. ConnelieNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Matter of Lane v. Port Wash. Police Dist.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Brownstone Publishers, Inc. v. New York City Department of FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.