Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Douglas David HOCK, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1999No. 98-10270PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, JR., Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant, Douglas David Hock, was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and one count of using a firearm in relation to a drug trafficking offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). After the Supreme Court’s decision in Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995), the parties filed a joint stipulation asking the court to vacate Hock’s § 924(c)(1) conviction. The court did so and then resentenced Hock on the drug charges. On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Bobby Lee HopperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Howard HandaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. William Richard MinorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Terry Erwin EYLER, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Walter CortesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. KellumCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. LivingstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Benitez-NavarreteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. BerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.