Legal Opinion

United States v. Benitez-Navarrete

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 16, 2003No. 02-50239; D.C. No. CR-01-00257-LGBPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Jesus Benitez-Navarrete appeals his one-hundred sixty-two month sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371, hostage taking, 18 U.S.C. § 1203, and use and possession of a firearm in commission of a violent crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm.

Benitez-Navarrete contends that the district court erred by enhancing his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2A4.1(b)(l) for making a ransom demand because § 2A4.1(b)(l) is inapplicable to the offense of hostage taking.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Ronald JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Daniel David KimpleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Lopez-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Mario Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Randy H. CHEE, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API