Legal Opinion

Rooney v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1946No. Civ. No. 15049PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITE, J.—This

action was instituted by plaintiff to recover the principal amount of two policies of health and accident insurance issued by defendant to Preston E. Rooney, plaintiff’s husband, by reason of the death of her husband.

By her complaint plaintiff alleged that the death of her husband resulted from injuries sustained within the meaning of the insuring clause of each policy of insurance. The wording of the insuring clause in each policy was identical.

*887By its answer defendant denied that the insured’s death resulted from injuries sustained within the meaning of the insuring clause of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Western Commercial Travelers' Ass'n v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
  2. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Rock v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Richards v. Travelers Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Hutton v. States Accident InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Anchor Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Weil v. Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cox v. Prudential InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Hargreaves v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Harrington v. New York Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API