Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co. v. Maus

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The defendants Pyle prevailed in this action on an express indemnity agreement tried before the court without a jury. Plaintiff, Hartford, appeals.

Mrs. Maus was president of Eugene Escrow Service, Inc., a corporation. The company engaged in the escrow business. Statutes required companies engaging in such business to provide a bond. Mrs. Maus secured the defendant George Pyle, a realtor with whom she had done escrow business, and his wife, the defendant Mary Pyle, to sign as indemnitors on the application to Hartford for such bond. Pursuant to such application a bond of escrow agency was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Erickson v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Williams v. Pacific States Fire Ins. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Meier v. PorterOregon Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company v. PyleOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. MausOregon Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API