Legal Opinion
State v. Frost
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 2007No. 77444-7PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
161 P.3d 361 (2007)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Joshua James FROST, Petitioner.
No. 77444-7.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued February 15, 2007.
Decided June 28, 2007.
Dana M. Lind, Nielsen Broman & Koch PLLC, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Andrea Ruth Vitalich, King County Prosecutor's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
J.M. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 The Sixth Amendment provides, in relevant part, "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to have the assistance of counsel for his defense."[1] This right to counsel encompasses the delivery of closing argument.[2]…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Glebe v. FrostSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. FryWashington Supreme Court · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.