Legal Opinion
White v. White Rose Food, a Division of DiGiorgio Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided July 12, 1999No. CV 93-4837(ADS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
In this hybrid action brought pursuant to section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (the “LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, arising from the disbursement of settlement funds following a plant closing, the Court previously dismissed the Third Amended Complaint against the defendants White Rose Food, a Division of DiGiorgio Corporation (“White Rose”), and the Furniture, Flour, Grocery, Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Warehousemen Union, Local No. 138 (the “Local 138”) by a Memorandum Decision and Order dated July 8, 1996, and as corrected on August…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- White v. White Rose FoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- White v. White Rose FoodCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- White v. White Rose FoodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Andrews Transport, Inc. v. CNA Reinsurance Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2001
- Glanville v. DUPAR, INC.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.