Legal Opinion
White v. White Rose Food
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 10, 2001No. 2000PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
237 F.3d 174 (2nd Cir. 2001)
STANLEY WHITE, ULYSSES BROWN, and DONALD W. SWANSON, individually and on behalf of all other persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants,
v.
WHITE ROSE FOOD, a division of DiGiorgio Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
Docket No. 00-7232
August Term, 2000
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
Argued: October 4, 2000
Decided: January 10, 2001
Following a bench trial, the district court found that plaintiffs had established their "hybrid § 301/DFR" claim by proving (i) that White Rose Food had breached its settlement agreement…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. O'NeillSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Abdullayeva v. Attending Home Care Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- Silva v. Peninsula HotelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Biberaj v. Pritchard Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Levin v. Tiber Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- District Lodge 26 v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.