MacGruer v. Denivelle
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment in favor of defendant in an action for maliciously obtaining an injunction. The respondent Denivelle had been in the imitation travertine business in eastern states; about 1912 he became the supervisor of all artificial travertine work for the Panama Pacific International Exposition at San Francisco. At such time the appellants MacGruer and Simpson (co-partners) had a contract for plain and ornamental plastering on Machinery Hall, one of the Panama Pacific International Exposition buildings. During this period appellants…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burke v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Runo v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Griswold v. GriswoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Vesper v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hudson v. ZumwaltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Schubkegel v. GordinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Schubkegel v. GordinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Schubkegel v. GordinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943