Legal Opinion
City of Ashland v. Price
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 12, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commissioner.
The City of Ashland is prosecuting this action to condemn certain property for expansion of its waterworks plant. KRS 94.680 et seq. The appellees, C. C. Price et al., were the ‘owners, and the appellee 'Mae Spriggs was the lessee of'the property. When the suit was instituted there -was an unexpired term of four years of her five year lease. Under instructions authorizing separate awards, a verdict of $41,500 was returned for the landowners and $9,600 for the lessee. Judgments for both sums were accordingly entered. The city appeals.
It seems sufficient to say that there…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. BurkOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Des Moines Wet Wash Laundry v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
- Korf v. FlemingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- NJ Highway Authority v. J. & F. HOLDING CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. SherrodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Urban Renewal Agency v. TrammelTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Ashland v. KittleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. FultzCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1962
- Commonwealth, Department of Highways v. Cardinal Hill Nursery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1961