Legal Opinion

Department of Corrections Ex Rel. People v. Adams

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 23, 1996No. 4 — 94 — 1050PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In October 1992, plaintiff, Illinois Department of Corrections (Department), sued defendant, Matthew Adams, to recover costs it had incurred during Adams’ incarceration, pursuant to section 3 — 7 — 6 of the Unified Code of Corrections (Code) (730 ILCS 5/3— 7 — 6 (West 1992)). Following a bench trial in October 1994, the trial court entered judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $88,988.29.

Defendant appeals, arguing first that section 3 — 7 — 6 of the Code is unconstitutional because it (1) violates the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution (U.S. Const., art. I, § 10) as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Ardt v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. Rodney H.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Horvath v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. People v. J.R.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  4. In Re JRAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. People ex rel. Director of the Department of Corrections v. MeltonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API