State v. Sheetz
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Defendant’s initial assignment of error concerns the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress the introduction of evidence. We find it necessary to review the propriety of the orders to resolve this contention.
I. Order (10 October 1978)
The order issued on 10 October 1978 was entitled “ORDER For Examination Of Business And bank Account Records.” The language of the order provided for an examination of the business and working records of defendant’s business, as well as those of the banks named therein. The order was different from those issued on 4 December and 13 December.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. HoltSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- In re Superior Court Order Dated April 8, 1983Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- In re Computer Technology Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.