In re Superior Court Order Dated April 8, 1983
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
NCNB challenges the order on a number of grounds. We dispose first of the constitutional arguments it attempts to bring forward. It is well established that a corporation such as NCNB has only a limited right, not applicable here, to object to process for production of documents on Fourth Amendment grounds. California Bankers Assoc. v. Shultz, 416 U.S. 21, 94 S.Ct. 1494, 39 L.Ed. 2d 812 (1974). Even if we were to find the order affects the constitutional privacy interests of NCNB’s customers, which it does not, United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435, 96 S.Ct. 1619, 48 *65L.Ed. 2d…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. KornegaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- In Re Superior Court Order Dated April 8, 1983Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- In re Computer Technology Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985