Legal Opinion

Araujo v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 23, 2004No. 3:03-cv-00002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER Re: Plaintiffs’ and Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

PATEL, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment regarding the impact of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Castro-Cortez v. INS on this litigation. Plaintiffs claim that they are entitled to summary judgment on the issue of liability, since the Ninth Circuit has already decided that question in their favor. Defendant, meanwhile, argues that a different question was at issue in Castro-Cortez, and thus that the Ninth Circuit’s holding is functionally inapplicable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Ronald E. Ting v. United States of America the Federal Bureau of Investigation Drug Enforcement Administration Internal Revenue Service Joe SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Thomas Dodd and Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, an Oregon Municipal Corporation, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moreno v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  2. Davila v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API