Legal Opinion

United States v. Cardascia

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 5, 1991No. Nos. 108-112, Dockets 90-1541, 90-1721, 91-1037, 91-1039 and 91-1040PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

This appeal reveals delineated plans in which different individuals in their haste to get rich committed numerous frauds and misapplied bank funds. Appellants are swindlers who created sham schemes and the bank officers who received commissions under-the-table for loaning the bank’s money to them. In doing so they proved the truth of Samuel Johnson’s dictum: “Avarice is a uniform vice ... to the fav-our of the covetous there is a ready way, bring money and nothing is denied.” S. Johnson, The History of Rasselas, XXXIX (Oxford Univ. Press). Appellants’ greed blinded…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  2. United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  5. United States v. FarhaneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API