Saily v. 500 Bushel Club
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmees, J.
Defendants appeal from the workmen’s compensation commission’s award of compensation. Plaintiff was employed by defendant club to set tables and wash dishes. She worked each day before and after the breakfast, lunch and dinner periods. Between those periods she had time off regularly when she was free to do as she pleased. On the day in question she finished her work in connection with the lunch period at about 1:30 p. m., when she went off duty, her time became her own, and she was not to be on duty again until 5:15 p. m. During that free period she was not required to do anything and had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morey v. City of Battle CreekMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Haggar v. TanisMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
- Pearce v. Michigan Home & Training SchoolMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Furino v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
- Nelson v. DETROIT COUNTRY CLUBMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- MacK v. Reo Motors, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
- Niederhouse v. PalmertonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Lewis v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Williams v. Glacier Park Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1962