Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Consolidated Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1964No. 40616PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

There is no merit in the contention that the defendant was negligent in the use of tile as a floor covering in its place of business, for tile of one kind or another —asphalt, rubber based, cork, plastic, ceramic, etc., has come to be perhaps the most widely used of materials in the building *172trade for covering floors. It is used on wood and on concrete— perhaps other bases. Architects specify it. Contractors use it. Builders buy it. Everybody accepts it.

This court took judicial notice in Holloman v. Henry Grady Hotel Co., 42 Ga. App. 347, 348 (156 SE 275) that marble is a…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. S. S. Kresge Co. v. FaderOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Miller v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Camp v. J. H. Kirkpatrick Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Summa v. Morgan Real Estate Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Hill v. Davison-Paxon Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Perez v. Lockheed Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Young Men's Christian Assn. v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Amear v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Colbert v. Piggly Wiggly SouthernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  5. Herschel McDaniel Funeral Home, Inc. v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API