Legal Opinion

Fiddelke v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 24, 1931No. 6303PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction under three counts of an indictment. The first count charged that on or about June 25,1930, at the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, and within the jurisdiction of the court, the appellant did unlawfully sell and distribute not in nor from the original stamped package a lot of morphine in quantity particularly described as two cans containing approximately one ounce each. The second count ehargod that *752at the same time and place the appellant did fraudulently and knowingly conceal and facilitate the concealment of the same…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rubio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  2. Robinson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  3. Wong Lung Sing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  4. Lee Tung v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
  5. Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. James Boyd Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  2. Pon Wing Quong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  3. James Butler Elkins and Raymond Frederick Clark v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. United States v. BuschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  5. Government of the Virgin Islands v. DowneyDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API