Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Pickett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 2003No. WD 60644PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

Dr. Roger Berlin appeals from the trial court’s judgment for the defendants in Berlin’s action on account against William H. Pickett and William H. Pickett, P.C. (collectively “Pickett”). The trial court, sitting as trier of fact, granted Pickett’s oral motion for a “directed verdict and/or judgment” 1 without making any findings, though respondent Pickett had requested findings pursuant to Rule 73.01. Because the trial court violated Rule 73.01 and because this court is unable to provide meaningful review, the judgment is remanded.

Factual & Procedural History

On…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. KneseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  2. Hammons v. EhneySupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Morris v. BrownMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State Ex Rel. Mathewson v. Board of Election CommissionersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
  5. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. BriggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Moxness v. HartMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Spry v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MO.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Berlin v. PickettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Ort v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Rohner v. BeetsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API