Ort v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., Presiding Judge.
Appellants, James Frederick Ort and Mary Lucille Ort (“plaintiffs”), appeal from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County partially denying plaintiffs’ petition requesting attorneys’ fees and costs. Plaintiffs brought suit against respondent, DaimlerChrysler Corporation (“defendant”), under 15 U.S.C. section 2310(d)(2) (the “Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act”) for breach of express and implied warranty, in which the jury returned a verdict for $7,500.00 in favor of plaintiffs. We affirm.
In August 2001, plaintiffs purchased a 2002 Dodge Ram Pickup…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Taylor v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Massman Construction Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Eureka Pipe, Inc. v. Cretcher-Lynch & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hibbs v. Jeep Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Moore v. BakerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blue Ridge Bank and Trust Co. v. HartMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Glandon v. Daimler Chrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Wise v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Bauer v. BowesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Roberts Plaza II, LLC v. 4915 LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.