Legal Opinion
Moxness v. Hart
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided April 13, 2004No. WD 62509PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAROLD L. LOWENSTEIN, Judge.
Northland Auto Brokers, an alleged L.L.C., Gregory Barnes, and Gregory Barnes doing business as Northland Auto Brokers, L.L.C. appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motion to intervene as of right in a garnishment action. Because Gregory Barnes had a right to intervene but Northland Auto Brokers did not, the judgment is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Facts
The respondent, Jason Moxness obtained a default judgment against John and Dee Hart for $181,390 in Johnson County Kansas District Court. Moxness, pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Call v. HeardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Reser v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
- Harrison v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Brown v. Maguire's Real Estate AgencySupreme Court of Missouri · 1938
- Yahne v. Pettis County Sheriff DepartmentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Charles v. Consumers InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Eckhoff v. EckhoffMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Unifund CCR Partners v. KinnamonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- BMO Harris Bank v. Hawes Trust Investments, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Richard W. Noble v. Linda L. NobleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.