Legal Opinion

State v. Nonog

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 14, 2008No. 60248-9-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

¶1 An information that alleges the crime of interfering with the reporting of domestic violence must specify the underlying crime of domestic violence. We hold that an information that is challenged for the first time on appeal sufficiently defines the charge of interfering if the count alleging the crime contains all the statutory elements and makes clear that the underlying crime of domestic violence is delineated elsewhere in the information.

¶2 A domestic violence no-contact order prohibited appellant Cipriano Nonog from having any contact with his ex-girlfriend, Nanette Estandian. On…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. State v. KjorsvikWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. KitchenWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. LeachWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. HopperWashington Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NonogWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State v. NonogWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State Of Washington v. Eric Charles MasonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. State Of Washington v. John A. HolcombCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API