Legal Opinion

Enloe v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Company

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 13, 1968No. 52818PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINCH, Presiding Judge.

Defendant (Pittsburgh) appeals from a verdict and judgment against it for $35,-000, which gives us jurisdiction.

Pittsburgh contracted with Fuller Construction Company to wreck certain buildings and do various construction jobs on its premises. Approximately three weeks before plaintiff was injured, Pittsburgh loaned to Fuller its Yale Forklift Truck No. 13 for use in connection with this work. Pittsburgh retained the obligation to repair and maintain the truck.

This forklift was used by Fuller in taking pallets of firebrick from boxcars and stacking them in a warehouse…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McDonnell Aircraft Corp. v. Hartman-Hanks-Walsh Painting Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Conduitt v. Trentonton Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  3. Girratono v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Bollman Ex Rel. Sanderson v. Kark Rendering PlantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Williams v. CavenderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matteuzzi v. Columbus Partnership, L.P.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Halmick v. SBC Corporate Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Gillespie v. St. Joseph Light & Power Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Howard Ex Rel. Howard v. LundryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Kelly v. Dairy Queen Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API