Strutz v. Brown
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Wilber, J. Assumpsit by Fred C. Strutz against Addison T. Brown upon certain promissory notes and .for services rendered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Long, O. J.
This action was commenced in the circuit court by filing a declaration on the common counts, with a copy of two promissory notes set out under proper notice; also a further notice was given, as follows:
“Thatthe following is a true copy of the particulars of plaintiff’s demand under the common counts of said declaration, viz.:
“To balance due for services as bookkeeper from October 16, 1894, to December 26, 1894, $50.
“ Interest on same,-.”
This was signed by plaintiff’s attorneys.
Defendant demanded a further bill of particulars, which was not furnished, and his default was entered for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamilton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Township of Buckeye v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Close v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Vanderhoef v. Parker Bros. Co., Ltd.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934