Legal Opinion

Township of Buckeye v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Gladwin. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

Plaintiff recovered in assumpsit for the amount of certain township orders issued to defendant while he was supervisor of the township. Three of the orders were payable from the contingent fund; were issued for the purchase of a book-desk; were signed by defendant as chairman of the township board, and made payable to himself; were presented, and the amounts thereof received, by defendant; and the book-desk was never purchased. The other three were issued by the *433commissioner of highways, were made payable to defendant, and purported to have been issued upon a contract for the construction of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowen v. School District No. 9Michigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Township of Denver v. White River Log & Booming Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Close v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Strutz v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Tanner v. PageMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API