Legal Opinion

Fritts v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1935No. 1258PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

Appellant and Fred Ferguson were indicted for (1) possessing an unregistered still, (2) carrying on the business of a distiller without bond, (3) working at a still not carrying the sign of “Registered Distillery,” (4) fermenting mash on premises other than an authorized distillery, and (5) possessing liquor upon which no tax was paid. Ferguson pled guilty. Fritts stood trial and was convicted.

1. The trial court denied a motion for an instructed verdict and this ruling is the principal error assigned. We have read the testimony and conclude that the circumstances…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lennon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. Parnell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Hargrove v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Coplin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  2. Smith v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
  3. Russell Wayne Carpenter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
  4. Abraham Robert Ayash, Also Known as Robert Crail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
  5. John Joseph Powers v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API