Legal Opinion

John Joseph Powers v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 22, 1962No. 6966PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered pursuant to Appellant’s conviction under the Dyer Act (18 U.S.C. § 2312). At trial, Appellant relied principally upon the defense of insanity. Expert witnesses, produced by both parties, gave conflicting testimony concerning Appellant’s mental responsibility at the time of the commission of the offense and, under appropriate instructions by the court, the jury resolved the issues against Appellant and returned a verdict of guilty. Appellant now asserts that comments of the trial court exceeded the proper bounds of discretion; that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Greenwood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Higgins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
  3. Fischer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  4. Rubenstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
  5. Fritts v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. Raymond Charles ShapiroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
  4. United States v. James E. McCrackenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. David Andrew Birdwell v. Jack Skeen, Jr., Criminal District Attorney of Smith County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API