Parnell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
COTTEBAL, Circuit Judge, dissenting on rehearing.
1Opinion of the Court
COTTERAL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, Dorsey Parnell and Gordon Hays, seek a reversal of convictions upon an indictment charging them and twenty-seven others with conspiring to. manufacture and deal in whisky, in ’Tillman county, Old., continuously from June, 1929, to October 7, 1930. Five of the defendants were not apprehended; seventeen pleaded guilty; seven wer’e tried, and of those there was a disagreement as to 1’. V. Bueh; Jake Sireiber, Leo Slade, and John C. Bellah were acquitted; Jake Bock and the appellants were found guilty.
The indictment charges that the conspiracy was formed in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wong Tai v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Jin Fuey Moy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Allen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Francis P. DavisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Shannon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Phelps v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.