Legal Opinion

Grenz v. Fire Casualty of Connect

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 2001No. 00-595PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier

¶1 Samuel J. Grenz appeals pro se from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Fire & Casualty of Connecticut (“F&C”) issued by the Workers' Compensation Court. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

¶2 The following facts are taken from our previous decisions in the “seemingly endless stream of litigation that has resulted in multiple appeals to this Court and innumerable proceedings in the Workers' Compensation Court.” Grenz v. Fire and Casualty of Connecticut (1993), 260 Mont. 60, 61, 857 P.2d 730, 731 (“Grenz III”). We need not address each of Grenz's prior claims for the purposes of this opinion.

¶3…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Grenz v. Fire & Casualty of ConnecticutMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Grenz v. Medical Management Northwest, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Slater v. Central Plumbing & Heating Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Heath v. Montana Municipal Insurance AuthorityMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Grenz v. Fire and Cas. of ConnecticutMontana Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Plouffe v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wiard v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Olympic Coast Investment Inc. v. WrightMontana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ponderosa Pines Ranch, Inc. v. HevnerMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Otteson v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API