Legal Opinion

Grenz v. Fire and Cas. of Connecticut

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1993No. 93-232PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

Claimant Samuel Grenz appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court dismissing his petition for workers’ compensation benefits. We affirm.

The dispositive issue on appeal is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in concluding that the one-year statute of limitations barred Grenz’ workers’ compensation claim for disabilities allegedly resulting from a series of microtraumas.

In 1984, Samuel Grenz injured his right elbow while working for the American Stud Company (American Stud) in Flathead County, Montana. He continued his employment with American Stud until 1985. American…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wassberg v. Anaconda Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Grenz v. Fire & Casualty of ConnecticutMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hughes v. BlankenshipMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Scott v. Utility Line ContractorsMontana Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Turjan v. Valley View EstatesMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Grenz v. Fire and Cas. of ConnecticutMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Grenz v. Fire Casualty of ConnectMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Hogenson Const. of North Dakota v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Boushie v. WindsorMontana Supreme Court · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API