Nicklas v. City of New Bedford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
The petitioner Herman by a petition filed April 27,1922," alleging entry “ on or about May first, 1921,” sought to have damages awarded for taking of realty for the widening of Second Street in New Bedford, March 11, 1921. The petitioner Nicklas was the holder of leasehold rights under the petitioner Herman, who was seised of the premises in fee, and Nicklas also owned the building on said leasehold estate. Under St. 1918, c. 257, § 187, subsections 23-31, *473now G. L. c. 79, §§ 23-31 inclusive, the petition of Herman was ordered to be tried with the petition of Nicklas to a jury at New Bedford.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edmands v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Cornell-Andrews Smelting Co. v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Sterling v. Frederick Leyland & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Lancy v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- City of Boston v. RobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Castaline v. SwardlickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Whitehouse v. Town of SherbornMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Jordan v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.