Legal Opinion

Simerson v. Simerson

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1910PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Submission on Agreed Eaots.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, C. J. (Perry, J., dissenting.)

The following are the agreed facts: Inly 29, 1907, William Kalaehao conveyed to his daughter Mary Nanea Simerson the land situate on Nuuanu street in ITonolulu, described in R. P. 3589, by deed of conveyance executed and acknowledged by himself and his wife, of which the following is a translation:

“Know all men by these presents that I, William Kalaehao, of Kapalamá, Honolulu, Island of Oahu, Territory of Hawaii, for the sum of One Dollar received in my hands from Mary Nanea Simerson, of the same place, and for my affection for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gentile v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Bodine's Adm'rs v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1890
  4. Fogarty v. StackTennessee Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Rines v. MansfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bishop v. MahikoHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Kauaian Development Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  3. In re RosenbledtHawaii Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Chater ex rel. Chater v. CarterHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Ako v. RussellHawaii Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API