Legal Opinion

Fogarty v. Stack

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1888PublishedCited by 25 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal from Chancery Court of Shelby County. K. J. Morgan, Sp. Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtFolkes, J.

The only question in this case is as to the proper construction of a deed made by Defendant Ed. Stack to his wife Margaret.

The language of the deed is as follows — so much of it as is necessary to he quoted: “Hath given, granted; bargained, sold, and conveyed, and by these presents doth give, bargain, grant, sell, and convey unto the party of the second part and her heirs, in fee-simple forever, a certain lot,” etc., describing it.

“To have and to hold said lot of land for the sole and separate use and benefit of the said second party, free from the debts, liabilities, and control of her…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. Triplett v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Teague v. SowderTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Utter v. SidmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. BellTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Southern Iron & Coal Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API