North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Underwriters National Assurance Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.
The question presented for review is whether plaintiffs motion for summary judgment was properly granted. This is a proper case for a declaratory judgment, G.S. 1-254, and the Guaranty Association is entitled to maintain the action. Blades v. City of Raleigh, 280 N.C. 531, 187 S.E. 2d 35 (1972). The propriety of a summary judgment in such action is governed by the same rules applicable to other actions, G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(a) and (b) and 57. Here, there is no substantial controversy as to the facts disclosed by the evidence and the legal significance of those facts…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Newman MacHine Company v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- NEWMAN MACHINE COMPANY v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Continental Bank & Trust Company v. GoldDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1956
3Cited by10 opinions
- Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Boyles v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- North Carolina Reinsurance Facility v. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Ingram v. Reserve InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Gardner v. TallmadgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.