Chizum v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.
Appellant, with Tony Mahoney and two other persons, was charged by affidavit with the alleged offense of automobile banditry. Acts 1929 p. 136, §3, §2548 Burns Supp. 1929. Appellant had a separate trial and was convicted. Judgment and sentence of imprisonment followed. On appeal to this court, he assigns as error the overruling of his motion to quash the affidavit; the overruling of his motion in arrest of judgment; and the overruling of his motion for a new trial.
That part of the affidavit material to the questions presented charged that appellant and others, naming them, “did then and there…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HomerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Hill v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- State v. CalhounSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- The People v. BravermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. CoveleskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- MIMS v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Neal v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Goldstine v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Finton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Ortiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.