Baker v. Hanks

INGRAM, Justice.

Billy Joe Baker and Travis Chandler sued James Hanks and D.R. Kemp, after Kemp had failed to repay money that Baker and Chandler had lent him. Hanks had arranged the loan. The trial court entered a summary judgment for Hanks and made its judgment final pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala.R.Civ.P. Baker and Chandler appeal from that judgment on their claims alleging breach of contract, fraud, and conspiracy.

A summary judgment is proper and must be affirmed on appeal if the evidence, viewed in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party, shows that there is no genuine issue of…