Legal Opinion

Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided November 24, 1981No. Civ. A. H-80-1421PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELY, Senior Circuit Judge,

Sitting by Designation.

Plaintiff Hycel, Inc. (“Hycel”) 1 seeks recovery against defendant Pan American World Airways, Inc. (“Pan Am”) under the Warsaw Convention 2 for damage to its Super 17 Blood Chemistry Analyzer (the “Analyzer”) that allegedly occurred during defendant’s shipment of the Analyzer from Brazil to Houston, Texas. Defendant denies liability and also contends that in any event the Convention limits its liability to $9.07 per pound. 3 For the reasons set forth in the following opinion the Court rejects defendant’s contentions and holds…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Jones v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mobil Chemical Company v. BellTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Honea, by Next Friend v. Coca Cola Bot. Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Sánchez Betancourt v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
  2. Boehringer-Mannheim Diagnostics, Inc., F/k/a Hycel, Inc. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. Commercial Union Insurance v. Alitalia Airlines, S.p.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  4. In Re Air Crash Disaster at Warsaw, Poland, Etc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
  5. Franklin Mint Corporation, Franklin Mint Limited, and McGregor Swire Air Services Limited v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API