Legal Opinion

Dole v. Hansen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1975No. Civ. 9148PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Judge.

This case involves the interpretation of an agreement drawn by appellants without the assistance of a lawyer. The appellants (Doles), who drew the agreement, contend that it is a lease and option and that the option later was exercised. The appellees (Hansens) contend that it was only an agreement to enter into a further contract and that the option provision was without consideration and was withdrawn before acceptance. The trial court found in favor of the Hansens and the Doles appeal. We affirm.

The facts essential to a consideration of the case are summarized, largely from the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alfson v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Greenberg v. StewartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Massee v. GibbsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Metzler v. O. J. Barnes Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Bjornson v. Five Star Mfg. Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Amann v. FrederickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jerry Harmon Motors, Inc. v. First National Bank & Trust Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Wachter Development, L.L.C. v. GomkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Pifer v. McDermottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API