Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury 95-1

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 27, 1996No. Misc. 96-317(JGP), 96-323(JGP), 96-324(JGP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER *

JOHN GARRETT PENN, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the Motion of Robert Anderson to Quash A Grand Jury Subpoenas Duces Tecum issued by Independent Counsel Donald Smaltz for the United States. The subpoenas, if enforced, would require three correspondents of Columbia Broadcasting Systems [hereinafter CBS] to produce testimony and documents concerning the production of a 60 MINUTES segment entitled “F.O.B.? Billionaire Businessman Don Tyson Explains His Relationship With Bill Clinton” [hereinafter the segment] which was broadcast on September 25, 1994. The…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Branzburg v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Alfonso J. Cervantes v. Time, Inc., and Denny WalshCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Special Counsel InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  2. United States v. SitzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  3. Dagesse v. Plant Hotel, NV, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
  4. In Re Grand Jury SubpoenasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
  5. M&I Eastpoint v. Mid-Med BankDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API