Legal Opinion

Young v. Ewing

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 13, 1911PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Whipple. Irwin superior court. June 22, 1910.

1Opinion of the Court

Lumpkin* J.

1. The evidence did not demand a verdict in favor of the party in whose favor it was found, and the first grant of a new trial will not be reversed. Cox v. Grady, 132 Ga. 368 (64 S. E. 262).

2. As the grant of a new trial is affirmed, the cross-bill of exceptions is dismissed, without prejudice to the right of the defendant in error in regard to a future determination of his exceptions pendente lite. Armour & Co. v. Burkhalter, 130 Ga. 370 (60 S. E. 850); Purser v. Thompson, 135 Ga. 732 (70 S. E. 569).

*173April 13, 1911. Complaint. Before Judge Whipple. Irwin superior court. June 22,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Armour & Co. v. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  3. Purser v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. M. H. Thompson v. C. S. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API