Legal Opinion

Moresi v. Nationwide Mutual

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1990No. TC 87-189 CV; CA A48571; SC S36179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*621VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Magdalena Moresi’s family vehicles were insured by Nationwide Mutual. The policy contained an uninsured motorist (UM) provision which provided:

“If [Nationwide] and the insured do not agree about the insured’s right to recover damages or the amount of damages, the following arbitration procedure will be used: after written demand for arbitration by either party, each party will select a competent and disinterested arbitrator. The two so selected will select a third.”

The policy also provided:

“Under the Uninsured Motorist Coverage any arbitration or legal action against…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Moresi v. Nationwide MutualCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Industra/Matrix Joint Venture v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Industra/Matrix Joint Venture v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. Beyt, Rish, Robbins Group, Architects v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
  4. Eugene Water & Elec. Bd. v. MWH Ams., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Greenwood International Inc. v. Greenwood Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API