Legal Opinion

Moresi v. Nationwide Mutual

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 5, 1989No. 87-189-CV; CA A48571PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Appellant appeals from a judgment holding that she is not entitled to arbitration. We reverse.

On June 28, 1985, appellant was injured in an automobile accident involving an uninsured motorist. At that time, her vehicle was covered by a policy issued by respondent that provided, in part:

“If [respondent] and the insured do not agree about the insured’s right to recover damages or the amount of damages, the following arbitration procedure will be used: After written demand for arbitration by either party, each party will select a competent and disinterested arbitrator. The two so selected will…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Union County School District No. 1 v. Valley Inland Pacific Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Industra/Matrix Joint Venture v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Moresi v. Nationwide MutualOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Industra/Matrix Joint Venture v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Beyt, Rish, Robbins Group, Architects v. Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
  5. Greenwood International Inc. v. Greenwood Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API