Industra/Matrix Joint Venture v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
After denying plaintiffs petition to compel arbitration of this dispute over performance of a contract, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that an arbitrator, not the court, should have made the decision regarding arbitrability and that, in any event, even if the court was the proper forum for hearing the case, it erred in granting summary judgment. We agree with plaintiffs first contention and consequently reverse and remand.
Plaintiff is Industra/Matrix Joint Venture (plaintiff or Industra/Matrix), an entity consisting of Industra…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Livingston v. METROPOLITAN PEDIATRICS, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Industra/Matrix Joint Venture v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Dex Media, Inc. v. National Management Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Peace River Seed Co-Op, Ltd. v. Proseeds Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Huntsinger v. BNSF Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017