Legal Opinion

Consolidated Indemnity & Insurance v. Dean

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 1934No. 4-3347PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

This suit was begun in the Pope Circuit Court against the appellant to recover $2,999. The complaint alleged that Mrs. Effie Dean is the duly appointed, qualified and acting administratrix in succession of the .estate of W. L. Dean, deceased; that Smith & Sandusky is a partnership composed of Thurman Smith and Lonnie Sandusky; that the appellants, Consolidated Indemnity Insurance Company, is a foreign corporation authorized to do a general insurance business in the State of Arkansas; that on April 14, 1931, W. D. Eakes, administrator of the estate of W. L. Dean, recovered judgment in the Pope…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chapman & Dewey Lumber Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  3. Gibson Oil Company v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  4. Dixie Bauxite Company v. WebbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Gant v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. LeftwichSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  2. McWilliams v. R & T TRANSPORT, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. The American Workmen v. LeddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API