Legal Opinion
Recamier, Mfg. Co. v. Harriet Hubbard Ayer, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 1932PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATTERSON, District Judge.. The plaintiff brought this suit for infringement of a registered trade-mark, and the defendant filed a counterclaim for similar relief. The trade-mark in dispute is “Harriet Hubbard Ayer” written in script form, for use on toilet articles. The plaintiff claims that its right to the trade-mark goes back to 1886, while the defendant traces a use beginning in 1907.
The plaintiff’s line of succession is Harriet Hubbard Ayer (1886-1887), Reeamier Manufacturing Company (1887-1896), Maria E. Rinn (1896-1920), Anna E. Reynolds (1920-1931), and the plaintiff. As early as…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Manhattan Medicine Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Coca-Cola Co. v. Koke Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Baglin v. Cusenier Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Worden v. California Fig Syrup Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Exxon Corporation, Humble Oil & Refining Corporation, Humble Gas Transmission Co. And Humble, Inc. v. Humble Exploration Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. First American Fund of Funds, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Healthpoint, Ltd. v. Stratus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
- Healthpoint, Ltd. v. Ethex Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
- Du Pont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.