Legal Opinion

In Re Phillips and Hornsby Litigation

District Court, M.D. Louisiana

Decided March 3, 2004No. 3:03-cr-00001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRADY, District Judge.

Before this court is the United States’ (USA) Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 6). Ryan Phillips and Gregory Phillips (the Phillipses) have filed an opposition. There is no need for oral argument. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over this fraudulent transfer action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the following reasons, this court denies the USA’s motion.

Factual and Procedural Background

This action has extensive procedural history because it has involved five separate litigation components, which were initially…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Willie Bea Grimes v. Texas Department of Mental Health and Mental Retardation Richmond State SchoolCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  4. In Re: HornsbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. MooreDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. SchippersDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2013
  2. Chambers v. Bendetti (In Re Bendetti)Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Amborn v. TaylorUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2020
  4. US Trustee, Eugene v. Lester, Jr.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API